shy_magpie: A Magpie (Default)
Feeling too catty for Bluesky where whining about this trope might be seen by someone who actually writes SF and I just want to bitch about people being stuck on the first level of implications after 20 years or more not make someone feel bad because they're one of the lucky 10k or they want a go at the toy even though a bunch of others have had their turn and are bored with it now.

Read more... )
Huh wasn't expecting to accidentally a fic.
shy_magpie: A Magpie (Default)
Hi hope nobody minds but I have a head canon or at least a possible interpretation of The Magnus Archives, that I want to get down but don't want to share with people who will see it as a TMA post first & a post by me second. For starters I'm not up to date & posting in part to try to re engage with the series. TMA spoilers under the cut.

Read more... )
shy_magpie: A Magpie (Default)
Don't mind me just figured out my taste in genre fiction has more to do with my anxiety & rank hang ups than going watching Beauty & The Beast at an impressionable age.

Read more... )
shy_magpie: A Magpie (Default)
CW // zombie fiction, discussion of killing someone so they don't turn zombie, discussion of leaving someone to zombies.

Watching a game on twitch and this is at least the third time I've seen "should you leave someone locked in a compromised jail during a zombie apocalypse?" presented like it was a moral quandary. I just don't get the premise. The point of zombies is that their victims add to their numbers, so even if you were thinking in the most evil manner (short of wanting the zombies to win), you don't leave someone to the zombie behind you because then you have 2 zombies behind you.

I could see it as a question if the cell was secure, because then leaving them to hear the monsters & hope someone comes back before they starve is a real dick move but possibly worth arguing if you have reason to believe they might hurt your party.

I could see someone thinking it was a clever question if they pointed out the third option of killing the prisoner so they don't become a zombie. "do you take in someone who could betray your people at any moment, leave them to an ugly death that risks their zombie coming after you, or do you kill them yourself?". I would think the writer was an edgelord who doesn't think prisoners are people but at least I could understand why it was a question.

It especially bothers me because in the 3 examples I remember they made a point of you having to take their word on why they were there. Like ok, let's say you don't believe a word out of their mouth, that still means you have no evidence they are a danger to you if you release them, and do know for a fact they are a danger to you if left to turn zombie. I mean if its the devil himself, you're armed for zombie & they don't even have a belt, make Lucifer walk point.

"Human"

Sep. 24th, 2020 03:13 pm
shy_magpie: A Magpie (Default)
Just put my finger on why SFF&H stories that put an emphasis on “being human” and fear of being turned into something different. What level of privilege is the writer on that they've never had their humanity doubted?
Not White? Not Christian? Not straight? not neurotypical? not able bodied? Then even if people haven't called you inhuman to your face you have read people talking about those like you like they aren't people. History is littered with examples of how many don't consider you human if you don't fit a very narrow definition and the violence that ensues.

Its little wonder so many of us latch on to tales about widening our definition of person and embracing the idea of living as a person without being human.

Profile

shy_magpie: A Magpie (Default)
shy_magpie

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 4th, 2025 08:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios